La esquiva categorización de Latour: ¿Análisis crítico o hibridación antagónica?

Abstract

This paper offers a meta-lecture (interpretation of the diverse interpretations) of the philosophical identity of Bruno Latour. The discussion is centered in three kinds of interpretations: critiques, defenses and self-definitions. Besides the sympathy or the rejection towards his philosophy, it is argued that the French thinker are resisted to be categorized by univocal labels or to be analytically dissected. Based on the reformulation of critical thinking proposed by the author, the “antagonist hybridization” is suggested as a nautical chart to properly understand the networks and assemblies that composed Bruno Latour as a philosopher.